Figure 1: A schematic diagram of excavated areas at Elms Farm, Heybridge (after Atkinson and Preston 1998, 93)
Figure 2a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. 50 - 15 BC: areas
Figure 2b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. 50 - 15 BC: pottery
Figure 3a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. 15 BC - AD 20: areas
Figure 3b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. 15 BC - AD 20: pottery
Figure 4a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 20 - 55: areas
Figure 4b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 20 - 55: pottery
Figure 5a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 55 - 80: areas
Figure 5b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 55 - 80: pottery
Figure 6a:Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 80 -125: areas
Figure 6b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 80 -125: pottery
Figure 7a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 125 - 170: areas
Figure 7b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 125 - 170: pottery
Figure 8a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 170 - 210: areas
Figure 8b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated area, c. AD 170 - 210: areas
Figure 9a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. 50 - 15 BC: assemblages
Figure 9b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. 50 - 15 BC: pottery
Figure 10a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. 15 BC - AD 20: assemblages
Figure 10b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. 15 BC - AD 20: pottery
Figure 11a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 20 - 55: assemblages
Figure 11b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 20 - 55: pottery
Figure 12a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 55 - 80: assemblages
Figure 12b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 55 - 80: pottery
Figure 13a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 80 - 125: assemblages
Figure 13b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 80 - 125: pottery
Figure 14a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 125 - 170: assemblages
Figure 14b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 125 - 170: pottery
Figure 15a: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 170 - 210: assemblages
Figure 15b: Correspondence analysis of pottery deposition by excavated feature, c. AD 170 - 210: pottery
Figure 16a: Correspondence analysis of pottery consumption by ceramic phase at Elms Farm, Heybridge: phases
Figure 16b: Correspondence analysis of pottery consumption by ceramic phase at Elms Farm, Heybridge: pottery
© Internet Archaeology
URL: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue21/2/tof.html
Last updated: Tue May 08 2007