Mini journal logo  Home Issue Contents All Issues

'The Technological Sublime': Combining Art and Archaeology in Documenting Change at the Former RAF Coltishall (Norfolk, UK)

Gair Dunlop and John Schofield

Cite this as: Dunlop, G. and Schofield, J. 2021 ‘The Technological Sublime’: Combining Art and Archaeology in Documenting Change at the Former RAF Coltishall (Norfolk, UK), Internet Archaeology 56. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.56.16

Summary

Concrete runway with black skid marks and grey blue sky
Runway 22a, Coltishall. October 2006. © Gair Dunlop

Since at least the 1990s, archaeologists and artists have been documenting military installations following the withdrawal of service personnel. They have usually embarked on these recording opportunities separately, experiencing these sites as derelict, lifeless places, with stripped buildings devoid of much of their meaning after their occupants have left. Archaeologists have typically created maps and made photographs. Artists have also taken photographs, but in addition made films and created soundworks. Wherever the medium and the motivation, the assumption is usually made that only those closely familiar with the rhythms and rituals of service life can begin to understand the emptiness of what remains. And being secretive military installations, creating a record during their occupation is never an option.

Uniquely, in the months leading to the closure of RAF Coltishall (Norfolk) in 2006, the RAF granted the authors unprecedented access to record the base's drawdown and closure. The project brought artists and archaeologists together to see what could be achieved in unison, while still maintaining some degree of research independence. In undertaking this survey, three related themes emerged: the role of art as heritage practice, new thinking on what constitutes landscape, and the notion of a 'technological sublime'. Following an earlier publication, we now reflect again on those themes. In doing so, we offer this collaboration between art and archaeology (traditionally considered two distinct ways of seeing and recording) as an innovative methodology for documentation, not least after the closure and abandonment of such military and industrial landscapes, where occupational communities had once lived. In this article, the words represent our ideas; the images and films are an example of the result.

  • Google Scholar
  • Keywords: archaeology, art, heritage practice, landscape, change, documentation, military installation, photograph, film, RAF Coltishall, Norfolk
  • Accepted: 18 June 2021. Published: 20 October 2021
  • Funding: This article was funded by the Department of Archaeology, University of York
  • PDF download (main article text only)

Corresponding author: Gair DunlopORCID logo
G.Dunlop@dundee.ac.uk
University of Dundee / http://www.atomtown.org.uk/

John SchofieldORCID logo
john.schofield@york.ac.uk
University of York

Full text

Figure 1: Dawn, October 2006. Flight pan, hangar, early morning. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 2: Briefing room: layered screens for projection, interwar modernist font. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 3: Firing Range: Return to ESA. Enigmatic object; training round casings were returned via the rotating disc to the range controller. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 4: Arrestor markers. 100 metres from each end of the runway; arrestor wires attached to sprung capstans were laid across the runways. If jets landed too fast, this was the last chance to stop them. When the wires and capstans were removed, these markers remained. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 5: Fuel Pods. Eyecatching: one of the first things I noticed when out on the field. Wires are to reduce static while filling. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 6: Spotters. As flying wound down, the spotters gathered for the last time. Hot dogs, coffee, and a warm farewell from the Duty Officer. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 7: Dispersals - monolith. Angular walling breaks up the field of vision for incoming aircraft, confusing and making targeting difficult. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 8: Blast. October 2006. Loudspeakers on Dispersal blast wall. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 9: Double Dispersals. The airfield grew in the postwar period to house Meteors, Javelins, and was then renovated and extended to take Lightnings. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 10: Entropic blast walls showing airfield edge and radio tower. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 11: Flight maintenance on 6 Sqn Jaguar. May 2006. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 12: Empty toolbox, 41 Sqn hangar. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 13: Jaguar Office. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 14: Jag Desert Office. Another piece of wall art in an otherwise unremarkable office. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 15: Control Tower. After final stripdown, October 2008. An opportunity for a moment of repose for security patrols. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 16: Colt Mural 1. At opposite ends of one of the large hangars, these huge pieces of wall art were produced for a squadron dance on return from Iraq. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 17: Colt Mural 2. At opposite ends of one of the large hangars, these huge pieces of wall art were produced for a squadron dance on return from Iraq. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 18: Runway 22a. Time and plant growth take their toll on the pristine surfacing of runway 22. October 2006. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 19: Runway 22b. Time and plant growth take their toll on the pristine surfacing of runway 22. May 2007. © Gair Dunlop

Figure 20: Runway 22c. Time and plant growth take their toll on the pristine surfacing of runway 22. June 2008. © Gair Dunlop

Films by Gair Dunlop

Jaguar Flight Simulator: Wales Incident. Inside the flight simulator at RAF Coltishall, strange fantasy worlds were enabled; while it is impermissible to film sensitive terrain and real training missions, I filmed anti-aircraft missile avoidance in North Wales. The realtime terrain wrapping onto geographically accurate frames leads to strange village and field effects. The Menai Bridge flythrough was irresistible.

Simulator/Realtime: Footage of the path taken around and through RAF Coltishall by a pilot in the Jaguar simulator, paralleled by an attempt to take the same route in a vehicle in the real world. Stopped at gunpoint by a patrolling RAF Regiment Land Rover; this turned into a very fast 'justify your methodology' conversation.

Dispersals: Observations of the airfield as a lived environment, a major-scale industrial workplace, and as a balance between alertness and idyll.

Ballard, J.G. 1964 The Terminal Beach, London: Victor Gollancz.

Ballard, J.G. 1972 The Atrocity Exhibition, London: Jonathan Cape.

Boulton, A. 2006 'Film making and photography as record and interpretation' in J. Schofield, A. Klausmeier and L. Purbrick (eds) Re-mapping the Field: new approaches in conflict archaeology, Berlin: Westkreuz-Verlag. 35-38.

Boulton, A. 2007a 'Cood bay Forst Zinna' in J. Schofield and W. Cocroft (eds) A Fearsome Heritage: Diverse Legacies of the Cold War, Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press. 181-92.

Boulton, A. 2007b Restricted Areas, Limited edition of 5000, Manchester Institute for Research and Innovation in Art and Design (MIRIAD), Manchester Metropolitan University and The Wapping Project.

Buchli, V. and Lucas, G. 2001 Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203185100

Cocroft, W.D. and Cole S. 2007 RAF Coltishall, Norfolk: A Photographic Characterisation, English Heritage Research Department Report Series 68/2007. https://research.historicengland.org.uk/Report.aspx?i=14579

Cocroft, W.D. and Schofield, J. 2019 Archaeology of the Teufelsberg: Exploring Western Electronic Intelligence Gathering in Cold War Berlin, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429442629

Cocroft, W.D. and Wilson, L.K. 2006 'Archaeology and art at Spadeadam Rocket Establishment (Cumbria)' in J. Schofield, A. Klausmeier and L. Purbrick (eds) Re-mapping the Field: new approaches in conflict archaeology, Berlin: Westkreuz-Verlag. 15-21.

Debord, G. 1958 'Theory of the Dérive', International Siuationniste 2, 62-66.

Fairclough, G. 2008 [2003] '"The long chain": archaeology, historical landscape characterisation and time depth in the landscape' in G. Fairclough, R. Harrison, J. Jameson Jnr and J. Schofield (eds) The Heritage Reader, London: Routledge. 408-24.

Graves-Brown, P. (ed) 2000 Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture, London: Routledge.

McAtackney, L., Palus, M. and Piccini, A. (eds) 2007 Contemporary and Historical Archaeology in Theory: Papers from the 2003 and 2004 CHAT conferences, British Archaeol. Rep. International Series 1677, Oxford: Archaeopress. https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407301150

Nye, D.E. 1996 American Technological Sublime, MIT Press.

Pred, A. 1984 'Place as Historically Contingent Process: Structuration and the Time- Geography of Becoming Places', Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74(2), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01453.x

Renfrew, C. 2004 Figuring It Out. The parallel visions of artists and archaeologists, London: Thames and Hudson.

Salaman, G. 1974 Community and Occupation: An Exploration of Work/Leisure Relationships, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schofield, J. 2006 Constructing place: When artists and archaeologists meet [ebook], Proboscis. http://diffusion.org.uk/?cat=16

Schofield, J., Cocroft, W., Boulton, A., Dunlop, G. and Wilson L.K. 2012 '"The aerodrome": art, heritage and landscape at former RAF Coltishall', Journal of Social Archaeology 12(1), 120-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605311426549

Shapland, M. 2020 'Capturing the spirit of singular places: a biographical approach to historic building recording', Post-Medieval Archaeology 54(1), 18-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2020.1750142

Virilio, P. 1991 Lost Dimension, New York: Semiotexte.

Wilson, L.K. nd A Record of Fear, Limited edition of 500, The National Trust and Commissions East.

Wilson, L.K. 2007 'Out to the waste: Spadeadam and the Cold War' in J. Schofield and W. Cocroft (eds) A Fearsome Heritage: Diverse Legacies of the Cold War, Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press. 155-80.

Internet Archaeology is an open access journal based in the Department of Archaeology, University of York. Except where otherwise noted, content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY) Unported licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that attribution to the author(s), the title of the work, the Internet Archaeology journal and the relevant URL/DOI are given.

Terms and Conditions | Legal Statements | Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy | Citing Internet Archaeology

Internet Archaeology content is preserved for the long term with the Archaeology Data Service. Help sustain and support open access publication by donating to our Open Access Archaeology Fund.